nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP addresses in <>
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:02:12 +0000
On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <andrew () ca afilias info> wrote:
I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't have an email problem at all. A
Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict validation...
Current thread:
- SMTP addresses in <> Seth Mattinen (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> William Herrin (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Donald Stahl (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Sean Donelan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Donald Stahl (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Joe Greco (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> William Herrin (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Joe Greco (Jan 07)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Andrew Sullivan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Alexander Harrowell (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Sean Figgins (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Greg Skinner (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> William Herrin (Jan 04)
- [admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <> Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Jeff Kell (Jan 04)