nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP addresses in <>
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:41:55 +0900
I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't have an email problem at all.Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict validation...
consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperabilty for a "notmail" system where following the specs was thrown to the wind.
randy
Current thread:
- Re: SMTP addresses in <>, (continued)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Sean Donelan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Joe Greco (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> William Herrin (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Joe Greco (Jan 07)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Andrew Sullivan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Alexander Harrowell (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Sean Figgins (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Greg Skinner (Jan 04)
- [admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <> Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Jeff Kell (Jan 04)