nanog mailing list archives
RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial
From: "Rod Beck" <Rod.Beck () hiberniaatlantic com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:47:33 -0000
Because the industry needs to attract capital, which is difficult when the payback period on capital expenditures continunes to climb and hence the rate of return continues to fall. The incumbents love to talk about what a great quarter they had selling DSL. But very few (if any) will disclose a profit and loss or cash flow statement for their broadband services. The incumbents provide very little visibility and one reason might be the underlying picture is UGLY. Regards, Roderick S. Beck Director of European Sales Hibernia Atlantic 1, Passage du Chantier, 75012 Paris http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com Wireless: 1-212-444-8829. Landline: 33-1-4346-3209. French Wireless: 33-6-14-33-48-97. AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth rod.beck () hiberniaatlantic com rodbeck () erols com ``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.'' Albert Einstein. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu on behalf of David Conrad Sent: Fri 1/18/2008 11:06 PM To: Scott McGrath Cc: North American Network Operators Group Subject: Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
Why does the industry as a whole keep trying to drag us back to the old days of Prodigy, CompuServe, AOL and really high rates per minute of access.
Because they want to make more money and not be a provider of a commodity (see: NGN)? Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial, (continued)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Tomas L. Byrnes (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial William Herrin (Jan 18)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial michael.dillon (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial michael.dillon (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Michael Holstein (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Scott McGrath (Jan 18)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial David Conrad (Jan 18)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 19)
- Message not available
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Scott McGrath (Jan 19)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Rod Beck (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 20)
- RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jan 19)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Simon Leinen (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Simon Leinen (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Matthew Moyle-Croft (Jan 20)
- Re: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial Taran Rampersad (Jan 20)