nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:33:10 +0100
* Mark_Andrews () isc org (Mark Andrews) [Wed 26 Nov 2008, 03:20 CET]:
It's used for both.
Yet from /usr/src/lib/libc/getaddrinfo.c --- /* Rule 7: Prefer native transport. */ /* XXX: not implemented yet */ ---But it is not used to distinguish between 2001: and 2002: as ::/0 has a higher precedence in the default FreeBSD IPv6 address selection policy table. Where does FreeBSD and by extension KAME get its strong preference for 2001: from? I just can't find the code.
(I'm reviving this old thread because you chose to ignore my mail to you but did not fail to reply to a single mail I sent to the list concerning this.)
-- Niels. -- "We humans get marks for consistency. We always opt for civilization after exhausting the alternatives." -- Carl Guderian
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Dec 09)