nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comcast DNS
From: Craig Holland <grinch () panix com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:42:09 -0800
Hi...
I find your report too specific. Can you make it a bit more generic, perhaps by not including the name of the company that provides a myriad of web-based services?
Isn't 'specific' good for operations related stuff? I mean if you are just complaining about something for the sake of complaining or are giving examples I can see where names wouldn't be necessary. Rgs, Craig
Current thread:
- Comcast DNS Matthew Elmore (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Comcast DNS Matthew Elmore (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Joel Esler (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Niels Bakker (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Todd Vierling (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Craig Holland (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Matthew Elmore (Dec 08)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comcast DNS Craig Holland (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Mike Lewinski (Dec 08)
- RE: Comcast DNS Darryl Dunkin (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS randal k (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS S. Ryan (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS b nickell (Dec 08)
- Re: Comcast DNS Mike Lewinski (Dec 08)
- RE: Comcast DNS Blake Pfankuch (Dec 08)
- RE: Comcast DNS Darryl Dunkin (Dec 09)