nanog mailing list archives
RE: Telecom Collapse?
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 16:24:06 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
The ILEC is the carrier of last resort. The wireless carrier doesn't have to build coverage everywhere. They don't need to serve that hog barn that requires a 10,000 feet copper loop while playing $17/month.
They gladly hit you up for an FCC mandated universal service fee on your monthly phone bill precisely to fund those subsidies. I remain unsympathetic to their plight.
jms
Current thread:
- RE: VoIP E911 - was: Telecom Collapse?, (continued)
- RE: VoIP E911 - was: Telecom Collapse? Blake Pfankuch (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Daniel Senie (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Martin List-Petersen (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? bill fumerola (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Chris Adams (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? William Warren (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Brett Frankenberger (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Frank Bulk (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Justin M. Streiner (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Frank Bulk (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Lorell Hathcock (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jack Bates (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? William Warren (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? mike (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jim Cowie (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Joe Greco (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jay Farrell (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Mike Lyon (Dec 04)