nanog mailing list archives
Re: RouterOS performance?
From: Charles Wyble <charles () thewybles com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:45:59 -0700
William Pitcock wrote:
Hi, We're looking at using Mikrotik's RouterOS for some some sort of software routing solution as part of our network in combination with supervised layer3 switching doing most likely some sort of limited BGP. Does anyone else here run it? Is it any good? Is it better than e.g. vyatta?
Hmmm...... the last time someone brought this subject up (hmmm mid July this year or so I think) it resulted in a 200 message thread. At least it felt like that. :)
Anyway the thread was pretty informative. Check the archives for details. Check out quagga, xorp, click (a ucla project). Vyataa has evidently changed from Xorp to Quagga for the control plane if I read the messages and changelogs/release notes correctly.
Feel free to post back with what you find or if you need additional resources. I'm sure others will post as well and give ya an earful :)
-- Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059 http://charlesnw.blogspot.com CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
Current thread:
- RouterOS performance? William Pitcock (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Joel Jaeggli (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Nathan Ward (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Scott Francis (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Nathan Ward (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Nathan Ward (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 19)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Nathan Ward (Aug 19)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 19)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Stefan Bethke (Aug 19)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Joel Jaeggli (Aug 17)
- Re: RouterOS performance? Paul Vixie (Aug 19)