nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update]
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:31:33 +0530
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
Really. How many people are actually doing IODEF? http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-csirt/iodef/
AISI - for example - and AISI feeds the top 25 australian ISPs - takes IODEF as an input And MAAWG does ARF, quite simple to use as well .. but they would take a standard format (with an RFC yet) if you and some other major players 1. Offer iodef (or say ARF) feeds 2. Tell them youre offering these feeds
It should be simple -- not require a freeking full-blown "standard".
Its a standard. And it allows automated parsing of these complaints. And automation increases processing speeds by orders of magnitude.. you dont have to wait for an abuse desker to get to your email and pick it out of a queue with hundreds of other report emails, and several thousand pieces of spam [funny how abuse@domain type addresses end up in so many spammer lists..] srs
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update], (continued)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Dave Pooser (Apr 16)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Simon Waters (Apr 16)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Joe Abley (Apr 16)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Greg Skinner (Apr 16)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Jack Bates (Apr 16)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] JC Dill (Apr 17)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Jack Bates (Apr 15)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] mark seiden-via mac (Apr 15)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 15)
- Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update] Joe Provo (Apr 15)