nanog mailing list archives
Re: Creating demand for IPv6
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 03 Oct 2007 03:57:19 +0000
drc () virtualized org (David Conrad) writes:
... You cannot simply wave a magic wand and say "there shall be no NAT". ...
actually, you can. see RFC 4966. don't be fooled by the title, it's not just damning NAT-PT, since it justifies doing so by stating that NAT is damned. (of course, waving a magic wand and saying something doesn't make it so.) -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RE: Creating demand for IPv6, (continued)
- RE: Creating demand for IPv6 michael.dillon (Oct 04)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Oct 04)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 William Herrin (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Tony Finch (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 John Curran (Oct 02)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Jon Lewis (Oct 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 William Herrin (Oct 02)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 02)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 David Conrad (Oct 02)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Paul Vixie (Oct 02)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6 Joe Greco (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6, and saving the planet Daniel Senie (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6, and saving the planet Mike Leber (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6, and saving the planet Adrian Chadd (Oct 03)
- Re: Creating demand for IPv6, and saving the planet Tim Franklin (Oct 04)