Re: Creating demand for IPv6, and saving the planet

[Mike Leber <mleber () he net>]

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Daniel Senie wrote:
> BTW, thanks for bringing this thread back to the question of creating 
> demand for IPv6. There's plenty of anti-NAT activity on other 
> threads. Some constructive discussion over ways to create incentives 
> to deploy IPv6 is worthwhile. The most common argument for deployment 
> of IPv6 is fear, as in "the sky is falling." Yeah, we all heard that, 
> and have for a decade. Got it. Now, is there some POSITIVE reason to 
> push IPv6? Fear is not a positive force.

Ok, I'll bite and throw out a wacky idea I've been mulling over.

As the data at http://bgp.he.net/ipv6-progress-report.cgi shows for the
IPv6 and IPv4 nameserver tests, some of the time IPv6 connectivity is
*faster* than IPv4 connectivity (66 out of 264 test cases), because of
network topology differences due to different peering and transit
relationships between IPv4 and IPv6.

So you could write a download accelerator for your browser that checked
IPv6 vs IPv4 connectivity and used whichever was faster.

With only 3 percent of neworks running IPv6 this idea is a little early,
still it would be a hilarious browser plug-in.  You could imagine it might
even have a little "IPv6 accelerator" icon that shows up in your status
bar when you've switched on the nitro.

(hehehe, shaving off that extra few ms of latency, yo!)

Mike.

+----------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -----------------+
| Mike Leber         Wholesale IPv4 and IPv6 Transit       510 580 4100 |
| Hurricane Electric     Web Hosting  Colocation                 AS6939 |
| mleber () he net                                           http://he.net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+