nanog mailing list archives
Re: 240/4
From: Alain Durand <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:21:36 -0600
On 10/18/07 2:17 PM, "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com> wrote:
Alain, Correct me if I'm wrong, but Comcast started moving to IPv6 addressing *because* they ran out of 10. space.
Absolutely. I made the point earlier, making 240/4 work is about the same order of magnitude as moving to IPv6. Not worth it for us. - Alain.
Current thread:
- Re: 240/4, (continued)
- Re: 240/4 James R. Cutler (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) Alex Pilosov (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) S. Ryan (Oct 19)
- Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Vince Fuller (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)