nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics via IX
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:48:01 +0800
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote:
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer customer advertisements over peers' advertisements. There is a customer's customer who is advertising more-specifics at the IX (and using a different source AS, to boot). I can think of a couple ways to prevent hearing these, but thought I should ask for suggestions first.you should honor your customers routing policy and simply accept the routes.
Ah, stealing transit 101. How I love thee. Adrian
Current thread:
- more-specifics via IX Bradley Urberg Carlson (Oct 14)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Bradley Urberg Carlson (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 18)
- Re: more-specifics via IX David Ulevitch (Oct 18)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX John Payne (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Che-Hoo CHENG (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Adrian Chadd (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX John Payne (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: more-specifics via IX Andy Davidson (Oct 15)