nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics via IX
From: Wolfgang Tremmel <wolfgang.tremmel () de-cix net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:41:34 +0200
Am 15.10.2007 um 07:09 schrieb Bradley Urberg Carlson:
I have a few customers' customers, who appear at a local IX. Due to the MLPA-like nature of the IX, I hear their prefixes both at the IX and via my own transit customers. I normally use localpref to prefer customer advertisements over peers' advertisements.There is a customer's customer who is advertising more-specifics at the IX (and using a different source AS, to boot). I can think of a couple ways to prevent hearing these, but thought I should ask for suggestions first.
you should honor your customers routing policy and simply accept the routes.
Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Tremmel e-mail: wolfgang.tremmel () de-cix net DE-CIX Management GmbH Phone: +49 69 1730 902-26 Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt Mobile: +49 173 340 4833 Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa Fax: +49 69 4056 2716 Registergericht AG Koeln, HRB 51135 http://www.de-cix.net Zentrale: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Koeln
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Current thread:
- more-specifics via IX Bradley Urberg Carlson (Oct 14)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Bradley Urberg Carlson (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 18)
- Re: more-specifics via IX David Ulevitch (Oct 18)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Stephen Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX John Payne (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Che-Hoo CHENG (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX Adrian Chadd (Oct 15)
- Re: more-specifics via IX John Payne (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: more-specifics via IX Andy Davidson (Oct 15)