nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail operators list
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:16:09 -0400
On 10/31/07, Alex Pilosov <alex () pilosoft com> wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[ snip ]
MLC's position is that anything that is acceptable for the conference is acceptable on the list. Mail operations are on-topic, although tangentially. Spam filtering is definitely off-topic.
Perhaps personal filtering is not, but spam appliances or home grown filtering, methods, code, or techniques for the purpose of despamming customer in/out mail is mail operations are, for all intents and purposes, on topic. I've demonstrated this myself in a few topics related to spam ddos and surrounding tools and techniques. The only thing I'd ask is that people don't branch off threads. It messes up our killfiles. :-) Martin Hannigan NANOG MLC Member
Current thread:
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?, (continued)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 29)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Al Iverson (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Joe Greco (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? chuck goolsbee (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Al Iverson (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Daniel Senie (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: mail operators list Al Iverson (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Alex Pilosov (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Martin Hannigan (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Martin Hannigan (Oct 30)
- BellSouth.net Mail Operator? (was:Re: Any help for Yahoo!...) chuck goolsbee (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Martin Hannigan (Oct 29)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Oct 30)