nanog mailing list archives
RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:49:42 -0600
Also, some issues with Intel, too: http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/sb/cs-006205.htm http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0608&L=wireless-lan&D=1&H= 1&T=0&P=5230 I know that this has been at least somewhat addressed, but I'm not sure if they are fully addressed. Regards, Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Casey Callendrello Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:20 PM To: nanog () merit edu; carl () personnelware com Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Hard-earned knowledge: Meru's single-channel approach has some compatability issues with certain drivers, most notably Lenovo laptops with the Atheros chipset. If you decide to go that route, make sure you have a USB key lying around with the latest drivers from the Lenovo site for the T60's wireless network. Regardless of your deployment, make sure your front line support staff (you DO have a helptable, right?) has the ability to update drivers on PCs without requiring wireless connectivity. An ethernet cable should work just fine :) --Casey Jeff Kell wrote:
Frank Bulk wrote:Foundry OEMs from Meru, which also uses a single-channel approach. It
does
not have an L1 requirement.Meru APs tunnel back to the controller, so any old L3 will do. We took an
AP home (just for grins) and it still worked back to our controller through residential broadband.
Jeff
Current thread:
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs, (continued)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Carl Karsten (Nov 12)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Casey Callendrello (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Church, Charles (Nov 09)