nanog mailing list archives
RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:06:30 -0600
Foundry OEMs from Meru, which also uses a single-channel approach. It does not have an L1 requirement. Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Niels Bakker Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:35 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] * frnkblk () iname com (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning beyond adding more "channel blankets".
I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing. Seems to work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so clients. * carl () personnelware com (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]:
On Wifi for 1000:
[..] In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working wireless - even with thousands of attendees: http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1347-Camp07-NetworkRevie w.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1247-23c3-noc-review -corrected.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/fahrplan/attachments/652-slides_network_r eview.pdf (They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this year's edition, by the way) Regards, -- Niels. -- "The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse, with four of the buttons on the keyboard." -- Peter da Silva <peter () taronga com>
Current thread:
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs, (continued)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Adrian Chadd (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Frank Bulk (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Carl Karsten (Nov 12)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Casey Callendrello (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Church, Charles (Nov 09)