nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 23:15:28 -0400
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:43:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: [snip]
Too bad the PC hasn't solicited a talk in this area. They ought to.
Too bad that the collective-we choose to beat up the PC for not providing agenda information in advance, and then change tack to beat them up when the increased transparency of incremental information for confirmed talks doesn't cover current timely issues such as earthquake impact or regulatory vagaries. Rather than assuming, suggestions for ways to provide insight to agenda works-in-progress would be useful. Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David Lesher (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Stephen Satchell (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Albert Meyer (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Andy Davidson (May 24)