nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:53:12 -0700
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:You work so hard to defend people that exploit children? Interesting. We are talking LEA here and not the latest in piracy law suits. The #1 request from a LEA in my experience concerns child exploitation.I think you'll find most intercept orders are drug cases.And no matter what, we still have a Constitution....sort of... Which brings up my point.... be sure and let your Hill Crittersknow what shit you are going though
So far, my involvement with law enforcement has been split evenly between illegal gambling and income tax evasion. Nothing else.
Of course, I'm based in Nevada; if I were elsewhere the gambling ("gaming" as it's called here) would most likely drop off the map.
Current thread:
- RE: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- RE: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jeff Shultz (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Donald Stahl (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Stephen Sprunk (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Donald Stahl (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David Lesher (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Stephen Satchell (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 12)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)