nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:03:49 -0500
On 5/10/07, Chris L. Morrow <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote: Jon,
there is no way this fellow is serious, nor is there anyway this fellow's advice should be taken without some serious legal discussions with in-house counsel... the penalties for non-compliance for CALEA are very steep (100k/day while an order is outstanding I believe?). -Chris
My understanding was data you had needed to be turned over when requested, but CALEA provides no specification/guidance on log retention. -brandon
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jon Lewis (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Brandon Galbraith (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steve Feldman (May 23)