nanog mailing list archives
Re: AUP enforcement diligence
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:58:47 +0800
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, David Barak wrote:
It does surprise me that no enterprising person/group has turned this into a salable feature: "we're the network which shuts down spammers/infected/baddies." I could imagine that there would be customers who would rather give their business to providers who are more active in this regard than less, and that would be a way for a service provider to differentiate themself from the rest of the pack.
People try that. They then get DDoS'ed. Then they stop. (Thats the people that try to do it by providing internet-based services. People who sell products probably fare slightly better.) Adrian
Current thread:
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property), (continued)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Justin M. Streiner (Mar 17)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 16)
- Message not available
- RE: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Frank Bulk (Mar 16)
- RE: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Berkman, Scott (Mar 15)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) William Yardley (Mar 15)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Jerry Pasker (Mar 15)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) William Yardley (Mar 15)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Jon Lewis (Mar 15)
- Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property) Gerry Boudreaux (Mar 15)
- Darned if they do or don't (was Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3) Sean Donelan (Mar 15)
- AUP enforcement diligence David Barak (Mar 16)
- Re: AUP enforcement diligence Adrian Chadd (Mar 16)
- Re: AUP enforcement diligence Steve Sobol (Mar 16)
- Re: AUP enforcement diligence Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 19)