nanog mailing list archives
Re: San Francisco Power Outage
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 24 Jul 2007 23:57:37 +0000
sethm () rollernet us (Seth Mattinen) writes:
I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as a reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing said combination of UPS and generators? What if it was important? I honestly find it hard to believe anyone runs a facility like that and people actually *pay* for it. If you do accept this is a good reason for failure, why?
sometimes the problem is in the redundancy gear itself. PAIX lost power twice during its first five years of operation, and both times it was due to faulty GFI in the UPS+redundancy gear. which had passed testing during construction and subsequently, but eventually some component just wore out. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RE: San Francisco Power Outage, (continued)
- RE: San Francisco Power Outage Brian Wallingford (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Jeff Aitken (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Paul Vixie (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Jason Matthews (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Michael Loftis (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Jason Matthews (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Paul Vixie (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Brandon Galbraith (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Paul Vixie (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Stephen Wilcox (Jul 25)
- RE: San Francisco Power Outage michael.dillon (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Ben Scott (Jul 26)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage David Lesher (Jul 25)