nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google wants to be your Internet
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:07:06 -0800
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:33 AM, <michael.dillon () bt com> wrote:
Just remember, IP addresses are *NOT* Internet addresses. They are Internet Protocol addresses. Connection to the Internet and public announcement of prefixes are totally irrelevant.
Of course I understand this, but I also understand that if one can get away with RFC1918 addresses on a non-Internet-connected network, it's not a bad idea to do so in and of itself; quite the opposite, in fact, as long as one is sure one isn't buying trouble down the road.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice Technology is legislation. -- Karl Schroeder
Current thread:
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet, (continued)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Nicholas Suan (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jim Shankland (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Chris L. Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Sean Donelan (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Adrian Chadd (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 20)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Mark Smith (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jason LeBlanc (Jan 24)
- RE: Google wants to be your Internet Jamie Bowden (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Joseph S D Yao (Jan 29)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Henning Brauer (Jan 29)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Brandon Galbraith (Jan 29)