nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google wants to be your Internet
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:38:11 +0800
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
I have an electic company, it's got 2500 partners, all with the same 'internal ip addressing plan' (192.168.1.0/24) we need to communicate, is NAT on both sides really efficient?
I've seen plenty of company setups that double/triple-NAT due to administrative/ security boundaries. The majority of them seem to be government organisations too. :) Adrian
Current thread:
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet, (continued)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet J. Oquendo (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jeroen Massar (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jeroen Massar (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Nicholas Suan (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jim Shankland (Jan 22)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Chris L. Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Sean Donelan (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Adrian Chadd (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 23)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 20)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Mark Smith (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Roland Dobbins (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Jason LeBlanc (Jan 24)
- RE: Google wants to be your Internet Jamie Bowden (Jan 24)
- Re: Google wants to be your Internet Joe Abley (Jan 24)