nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?
From: Gian Constantine <constantinegi () corp earthlink net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:26:13 -0500
I am pretty sure we are not becoming a VoD world. Linear programming is much better for advertisers. I do not think content providers, nor consumers, would prefer a VoD only service. A handful of consumers would love it, but many would not.
Gian Anthony Constantine Senior Network Design Engineer Earthlink, Inc. On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
If we're becoming a VOD world, does multicast play any practical role invideo distribution? Frank -----Original Message-----From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf OfMichal Krsek Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:28 AM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: nanog () merit eduSubject: Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?Hi Marshall,- the largest channel has 1.8% of the audience - 50% of the audience is in the largest 2700 channels - the least watched channel has ~ 10 simultaneous viewers - the multicast bandwidth usage would be 3% of the unicast.I'm a bit skeptic for future of channels. For making money from the long tail, you have to have to adapt your distribution to user's needs. It is notonly format, codec ... but also time frame. You can organise your programs in channels, but they will not run simultaneously for all the users. I wantto control my TV, I don't want to my TV jockey my life.For the distribution, you as content owner have to help the ISP find the right way to distribute your content. In example: having distribution centerin Tier1 ISP network will make money from Tier2 ISP connected directly to Tier1. Probably, having CDN (your own or pay for service) will be the onlyone way for large scale non synchronous programing. Regards Michal
Current thread:
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?, (continued)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Gian Constantine (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Petri Helenius (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Marshall Eubanks (Jan 09)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Michal Krsek (Jan 10)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Michal Krsek (Jan 10)
- RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Frank Bulk (Jan 12)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Gian Constantine (Jan 12)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Michal Krsek (Jan 12)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 12)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Steve Sobol (Jan 12)
- Nanog subscribers to pull down 2 megabytes a day, continuously ... of one thread nealr (Jan 12)
- RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Bora Akyol (Jan 15)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Dave Israel (Jan 15)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Stephen Sprunk (Jan 20)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Alexander Harrowell (Jan 21)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Joe Abley (Jan 21)
- Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? D.H. van der Woude (Jan 21)