nanog mailing list archives
Re: 4 Byte AS tested
From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem () maem org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:04:17 +0900
Hi Randy, Yes. We can never have the knowledge of *all* BGP speakers in the world, then keeping a 4-byte ASN announced to let everyone observe it looks a good strategy to see what would be happening. The test you did has already proven that the current Internet routing system has no serious problem with 4-byte ASN. ( Did it have any? ) Regards, Akinori In message <45A6B100.3080202 () psg com> "Re: 4 Byte AS tested" "Randy Bush <randy () psg com>" wrote: | MAEMURA Akinori wrote: | > Hi Geoff, | > | > Do you have any plan for another trial longer and notified | > so that everyone with various implementations of OLD SPEAKER | > can observe this and check if they normally handle a 4-byte | > ASN? | | the test is known to have gone through juniper, cisco, and procket | routers. | | though, of course, we have no idea if there would be proof of | termination testing all permutations of cisco hardware and images. :) | | randy |
Current thread:
- 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Arnold Nipper (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Antti Louko (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Joe Provo (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Todd Underwood (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested MAEMURA Akinori (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested MAEMURA Akinori (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Arnold Nipper (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested bmanning (Jan 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)