nanog mailing list archives
Re: 4 Byte AS tested
From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:16:24 +1100
At 04:59 AM 12/01/2007, Todd Underwood wrote:
all, we (renesys) saw as23456 adjacent to both 1221 (expected) and 65001 (not), originating two prefixes: 203.10.62.0/24 and 203.10.63.0/24 paths looked like: <peer> 7474 1221 65001 23456 23456 23456 and many similar
This particular path illustrates the point - in actual fact the trailing 3 entries were NOT instances of AS path prepending, but were in fact 2 byte AS translations of AS 1.101, AS1.102 and AS 1.103.
Geoff
Current thread:
- 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Arnold Nipper (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Antti Louko (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Joe Provo (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Todd Underwood (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested MAEMURA Akinori (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested MAEMURA Akinori (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: 4 Byte AS tested Geoff Huston (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Arnold Nipper (Jan 11)
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested bmanning (Jan 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 4 Byte AS tested Randy Bush (Jan 11)