Re: botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf

[James Blessing <james.blessing () entagroup com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

michael.dillon () bt com wrote:

> You misunderstand. The problem of securing machines *IS* solved. It is
> possible. It is regularly done with servers connected to the Internet.
> There is no *COMPUTING* problem or technical problem. 

True *BUT* (and this is a really big but) it requires that you do something
*BEFORE* you connect it to the Internet.

> The problem of the 100 million machines is a social or business problem.
> We know how they can be secured, but the solution is not being
> implemented.

Whilst the problem is social in terms of people not knowing/wanting to do the
securing before connecting, the technical solution is to make the software
secure by default. If you think anything else then you are delusional.

J

- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF1fBaR+KszLBLUT8RAo+AAJ97RxMBhyZY2MQMRAFs3KWM7EPkHACgqebN
g/nOPkbZffyEDoWAIEvQUK0=
=w0iC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----