nanog mailing list archives
RE: IP Block 99/8
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Marcus H. Sachs wrote:
If we had "clean" registries and signed/verifiable advertisements this would not be an issue. Most of you know that DHS was pushing the Secure Protocols for the Routing Infrastructure initiative (http://www.cyber.st.dhs.gov/spri.html). Due to budget cuts this program is on the shelf for now. However, we are still interested in making it happen.
The grass is always greener, which is closely related to don't watch sausage being made.
Telephone numbers are over 50 years old, but routing of telephone numbers isn't actually verifiable either especially with some international destinations.
Almost all multi-organizational identity systems have this problem. If you can't trust the organizations involved, more math isn't going to help.
Current thread:
- IP Block 99/8 Shai Balasingham (Apr 20)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 bmanning (Apr 20)
- RE: IP Block 99/8 Marcus H. Sachs (Apr 20)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 20)
- RE: IP Block 99/8 Sean Donelan (Apr 21)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) J. Oquendo (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Kradorex Xeron (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Bill Woodcock (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) J. Oquendo (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Jerry Dixon (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Sandy Murphy (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Mike Tancsa (Apr 23)
- Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic) Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 23)