nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN sucks? was Re: Kremen's Buddy?


From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:41:56 -0700


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Alain Hebert wrote:

   Hi,

   All our experiences consulting our clients about how to get their AS
and Subnets have been pretty easy and fast.

   First get enought IP from 2 Peer to justify at least a /21;

   Now that you have 2 Peer, request the AS and a Subnet from ARIN;

   Take a day or 2 to prepare the paperwork;

   Submit it in the right sequence to ARIN;

   And LISTEN to your ARIN rep, they know how the procedure must be done
and will help your get it done correctly.

   Simple really.
- --------------------------
I'm in the process of obtaining PI & ASN for my customer. Looking at
ARIN's template, it appears to be pretty straight forward.

1. POC
2. ORG ID
3. AS Number
4. End-User Network Request (/22)

Provided there aren't any issues with the filings, this entire process
shouldn't take more than 1 week tops.


regards,
/virendra







Hank Nussbacher wrote:



Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

Try looking at it from an outsider's point of view instead. If
you're new to dealing with ARIN, it is not uncommon to find the
process is absolutely baffling, frustrating, slow, expensive, and
requiring intrusive disclosure just shy of an anal cavity probe.


I recently had to do the ARIN process for a customer from beginning to
end.  Never had experience with ARIN, nor its methods or templates
(only RIPE experience).

Took 5 weeks to get a /19 and then an additional 4 weeks to get the
ASN.  YMMV.

-Hank Nussbacher
http://www.interall.co.il




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFCXhEpbZvCIJx1bcRAplAAJkBPRQtw4TkAmteEXmdk3LTlrIaLACgtimT
PvbaT4t0w2AbWohvhuU1/6Y=
=sxRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: