nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL Lameness
From: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () wvi com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:20:42 -0700
Along the lines of "a picture is worth...etc.." an actual example of an e-mail that is sent out generating that error would be very useful.
I'm guessing that, from the page at the URL provided, AOL has decided that banning dotted quads from e-mails will cut down on the spam and phishing scams. They very well might be right.
Mike Lyon wrote:
OK, I should clarify this. The description that is on that link I put in my original e-mail doesn't actually describe what is happening, but that is the error they spit back at me. What really is happening is that the url that is in my e-mail and when you reolve it to an IP, if you do a reverse lookup on that IP, it comes back with a generic DNS entry that my colo provider has assigned to it. So the issue seems to be that the reverse DNS entry and the domain name don't match. But this isn't really an issue, a lot of providers do it this way. But why is AOL being lame with this? -Mike On 10/2/06, Matt Baldwin <baldwinmathew () gmail com> wrote:Yes, I'm noticing this too. Very lame indeed. Doing a quick Google on it in the Groups it seems that it was a feature that was enabled earlier this year. My guess is they turned it off, then turned it back on. Anyone from AOL care to explain this behavior and what should be communicated to the end-user? Thanks. -matt On 10/2/06, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com> wrote: > > Is anyone else noticing new AOL lameness that when you send an e-mail > to an AOL user and if the e-mail has a URL in it but the reverse > lookup of that url doesn't come back to that domain name that AOL's > postmaster rejects it and gives you this URL: > http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvuip.html >> This has to be new policty for them because it never rejected them before...> > Ugh. > > -Mike >
-- Jeff Shultz
Current thread:
- AOL Lameness Mike Lyon (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Steve Atkins (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Bill Woodcock (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Bill Woodcock (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Bill Woodcock (Oct 02)
- Message not available
- Re: AOL Lameness Mike Lyon (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Jeff Shultz (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness trainier (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Joseph S D Yao (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Rick Kunkel (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness up (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Steven Champeon (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Ian Mason (Oct 02)
- International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Etaoin Shrdlu (Oct 02)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Joel Jaeggli (Oct 02)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Rick Kunkel (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Mike Lyon (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Steve Atkins (Oct 02)