nanog mailing list archives
Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness)
From: Rick Kunkel <kunkel () w-link net>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Judicious clipping; hope I kept the right attributions... Ian Mason wrote:On 2 Oct 2006, at 23:39, Rick Kunkel wrote:I had users that appeared to be getting their email blocked seemingly because in their sigs, they write their phone number that stupid IP-Address-Wannabe method, like: 206.555.1212 As an aside, is this something that's the norm in other places, like commas instead of periods for decimals in other countries? I'd hate to sound critical if it was.Normal practice in France; Belgium too I think.It's normal in a lot of places. When you start to add in country codes, I suspect it's easier to type number dot number rather than plus number parenthesis number parenthesis number hyphen number and so on. I converted all my phone list numbers to that format long ago. It's just cleaner. Never thought about whether it was cool, or not. "Cool" is not on my radar. -- In April 1951, Galaxy published C.M. Kornbluth's "The Marching Morons". The intervening years have proven Kornbluth right. --Valdis Kletnieks
Boy, this is certainly OT. But one more... I just responded to someone else off-list, but figured I'd paste it in here too. Essentially, I don't think it's a BAD way of doing it. On the contrary, it's certainly more consistently delimited than other ways. I just get a little annoyed with the American general public's motivations sometimes. (Although, I'm quite fascinated by it as well...) ---- PASTING ---- I had a suspicion it might be standard somewhere. Now if only the metric system would catch on in standard practice, and not just in the sciences. Despite the fact that it is standard in some places, I feel that the relatively recent American embracement of it is more a function of pop culture at work than actual practicality. I suppose if the end result is a more internationally standard way of doing things, I shouldn't complain about the reasons for doing it though... --Rick
Current thread:
- Re: AOL Lameness, (continued)
- Re: AOL Lameness Jeff Shultz (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Lameness trainier (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Joseph S D Yao (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Rick Kunkel (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness up (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Steven Champeon (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Ian Mason (Oct 02)
- International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Etaoin Shrdlu (Oct 02)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Joel Jaeggli (Oct 02)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Rick Kunkel (Oct 02)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Joe Abley (Oct 03)
- Re: International phone numbers (was Re: AOL Non-Lameness) Joe Abley (Oct 03)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Bill Woodcock (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Jim Popovitch (Oct 02)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Simon Waters (Oct 03)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Barry Shein (Oct 03)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Randy Bush (Oct 03)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness J. Oquendo (Oct 04)
- Re: AOL Non-Lameness Thomas Leavitt (Oct 04)
- Re: AOL Lameness Steve Atkins (Oct 02)