nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend?
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:10:02 +0100
* Christopher J. Pilkington:
We have a disaster recovery site which will have a clone of the myriad production servers. We'd like to fail over to that site automagically. I'm thinking advertising the same prefix and just doing several as-prepends. However, now I'm not sure if this is a polite thing to do or not.
Can your backup servers run in parallel to your primary servers? How do you handle conflicting updates (assuming that the services are not completely stateless)?
Current thread:
- Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Christopher J. Pilkington (Feb 16)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Andy Davidson (Feb 16)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Florian Weimer (Feb 16)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Ejay Hire (Feb 16)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Warren Kumari (Feb 16)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Todd Vierling (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Todd Vierling (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Todd Vierling (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Warren Kumari (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 17)
- Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? Todd Vierling (Feb 17)