nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Per Heldal wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:39:59 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu said:On the other hand, he *does* have a valid point. Why *do* we keep seeing queries for the same networks?Because no-one has the balls to punish them in a way that really hurt their bottom line. It's mostly about companies where ops are not allowed to work on problems not related to paying customers. I bet their bean-counters would create accounts for misc-problems in record time if the top 10 transit networks would null-route their AS'es for a while.
uhm, where's the incentive in that for a 'tier-1' provider? most of the folks mentioned are customers or peers, so there exists a contact path already...
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact?, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Per Heldal (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Dave Stewart (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Joe Abley (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Mark Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Martin Hannigan (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Richard Cox (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Peter Corlett (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Per Heldal (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 03)
- Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? Per Heldal (Feb 03)