nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)
From: "♓" <peter.moody () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:11:31 -0800
"I have a bots infested network, they really task my services! How can I make my services ignore them so that the clients start calling me and spending my tech support budget?"
Or: "I have bots on my network and as part of a multi-pronged approach to cleaning my network while keeping the services available to those who aren't infected, I'd like to research ways that I can minimize the effect these bots have on the rest of my customers" Cheers, .pm
Current thread:
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware), (continued)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Petri Helenius (Dec 10)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Jo Rhett (Dec 27)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Simon Waters (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Matt Ghali (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Luke C (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Luke C (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Simon Waters (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Matt Ghali (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Mark Andrews (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Matt Ghali (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) ♓ (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Jo Rhett (Dec 27)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Network security practices survey Sean Donelan (Dec 09)