nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:12:03 -0800
--- jrhett () svcolo com wrote: On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Lawful in which country?
What is this group's name? Oh yeah. So that means you have one of two choices ;-) ---------------------------------------------------- I was speaking about 'the internet' and not just the NA part of it. It's my goal to keep pointing out that 'the internet' isn't only the US and, therefore, a particular government's rules (whatever government that may be) don't apply. Unless, of course, every country gets their own 'Great Firewall of China'. Also, NANOG is the closest thing I can find to a GNOG (Global). scott
Current thread:
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware), (continued)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Mark Andrews (Dec 11)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Gadi Evron (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Douglas Otis (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Scott Weeks (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Jo Rhett (Dec 27)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Jo Rhett (Dec 27)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Fergie (Dec 08)
- Network security practices survey Sean Donelan (Dec 09)
- RE: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Frank Bulk (Dec 08)
- Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware) Scott Weeks (Dec 27)