nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8
From: Allan Houston <ahouston () blueyonder co uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:31:02 +0000
Scott Morris wrote:
So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the irritation of manually updating things yourself???That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness.Scott -----Original Message-----From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:55 AMTo: Jack Bates Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jack Bates wrote:Allan Houston wrote:This probably isn't helped much by sites like completewhois.com still showing these ranges as bogons..http://www.completewhois.com/bogons/active_bogons.htm They've ignored all my attempts to get them to update so far.. sigh..They just need someone using the address space to slap them with alawsuit.
I've spent a fairly substantial amount of time over the last few weeks attempting to get ISPs / hosting centers / little Johnny's server in his mom's basement to debogonise my 77.96.0.0/13 prefix.
I can tell you that I've heard no less than four times from networking bods that we're still listed as a bogon on completewhois.com, that they don't think they need to update their filters etc etc.
So while I agree entirely that you shouldn't use these sites for accurate filters, we have to recognise that in an imperfect world there are some people who do choose to use them, no matter how silly we feel it is..
Guess the point I'm making is that chasing down bad bogons is a frustrating enough task without an alledgedly accurate listing site posting out of date info.
PS - if anyone has a networking contact at ev1servers.net , please send me a mail because I'm getting hair loss I can ill afford trying to get them to remove their bogon filters.
Current thread:
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8, (continued)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jack Bates (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Chris L. Morrow (Dec 11)
- RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Scott Morris (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jared Mauch (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Stephen Satchell (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jeroen Massar (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Florian Weimer (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jack Bates (Dec 11)
- Another bogon block: 2001:678::/29 (Was: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8) Jeroen Massar (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jon Lewis (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Allan Houston (Dec 11)
- RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Donald Stahl (Dec 11)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jack Bates (Dec 11)
- RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 David Schwartz (Dec 13)
- RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Michael . Dillon (Dec 13)
- RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 william(at)elan.net (Dec 13)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Jack Bates (Dec 13)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 Roland Dobbins (Dec 14)
- Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8 bmanning (Dec 11)