Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)

[John Payne <john () sackheads org>]

On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

> On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
>
> > Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently.  From my point of
> > view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find
> > that's even remotely related.
>
> Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to  
> notify
> are the kind of places that also have non-functional abuse@ addresses,
> do you have an actual *better* suggestion?

To *try* the *relevant* abuse@ addresses before scattershotting?

I'm talking about ME receiving a complaint from them about a Yahoo!  
issue... that's how bad it is.
(No, I don't work for Yahoo!, my employer does have a relationship  
with them, but we don't provide them IP connectivity).