nanog mailing list archives
Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:34:11 -0400
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently. From my point of view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find that's even remotely related.
Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to notify are the kind of places that also have non-functional abuse@ addresses, do you have an actual *better* suggestion?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Foundry Old Switch vs Old Cisco one Kim Onnel (Apr 03)
- Re: Foundry Old Switch vs Old Cisco one Bjørn Mork (Apr 03)
- abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) neal rauhauser (Apr 03)
- Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) Michael Painter (Apr 03)
- Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) John Payne (Apr 04)
- Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) John Payne (Apr 04)
- Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) neal rauhauser (Apr 03)
- Re: Foundry Old Switch vs Old Cisco one Bjørn Mork (Apr 03)
- Hi United! -> Chase.US Was:Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) Martin Hannigan (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Foundry Old Switch vs Old Cisco one David Hubbard (Apr 03)