nanog mailing list archives
Re: image stream routers
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Lincoln Dale wrote:
right. what i'm pointing out is that if Imagestream routers really ARE capable of >OC12 (and perhaps multiple of them) then its unlikely its s/w-based forwarding.
doesnt mean they are violating GPL to do it. look at nvidia for example. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: image stream routers, (continued)
- Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Paul G (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Deepak Jain (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers tony sarendal (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Jon Lewis (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers sthaug (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Edward B. Dreger (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Edward B. Dreger (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Lincoln Dale (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Dan Hollis (Sep 17)
- Re: image stream routers Lincoln Dale (Sep 17)