nanog mailing list archives
Re: Katrina Network Damage Report
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:37:01 -0400
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:26:20 EDT, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu said:
Given that ther's not 2**80 atoms on the planet, yes, that *would* be an = ouch.
D'oh!. There are 2**80 atoms. Somebody misremembered Avogadro's number. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report, (continued)
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report bmanning (Sep 11)
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Joel Jaeggli (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Dave Stewart (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)