nanog mailing list archives
Re: Katrina Network Damage Report
From: George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:40:30 -0700
Randy wrote:
George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>Looking at the routing tables you see failures. If a prefix goes away completely and utterly, and is truly unreachable, then anyone trying to see it is going to see an outage.not if a covering or more specific tells us how to get packets to the destination. but perhaps that's what you mean by a prefix being unreachable and i am being too picky.
Yes, to clarify, by "completely and utterly" i mean not just the prefix that you saw drop, but more specific and more general routes that you may have access to as well. -george william herbert gherbert () retro com
Current thread:
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report, (continued)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Dave Stewart (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)