nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:27:25 +0100 (IST)
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Yea, but only by chance, not by design. ;-)
Nope, by design. Routing would generally be better. The entire area would effectively be multihomed to the set of area-ISPs.
There'd be some downsides too, eg where a provider attracting traffic for the prefix has some failure internally and for some reason doesn't withdraw the area-aggregate to ASes wholly external to the area.
regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: To give of yourself, you must first know yourself.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Tom Vest (Oct 19)