nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:49:04 +0200
Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:Traffic flows will just happen there. Forget capacity planning. You'd have a hard time finding ISP's interested in that.Maybe.Look at it the other way though, it's a business opportunity - you can make money by attracting as much area-destined external traffic as possible and handing it off to correct intra-area ISP for that subscriber. The more the better, it's a potential revenue source. It's in your interest to be able to carry all the external traffic into the area that you can get.
Do you care from which upstream you get your connectivity from? Do you care whether it is Sprint, Level(3) or Cogent? Apparently you don't. With your proposed you don't have much/any influence on the way your packets take. -- Andre
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)