nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:09:18 +0200
I don't think users need to be charged any extra for IPv6 if it runs in the same pipe as their actual IPv4 one. Do we charge to our customers when we solve a bug or problem in our network ? IPv6 was invented to solve a "bug" in IPv4: The lack of enough addresses. Of course, now IPv6 could bring extra features, and we should take the opportunity to make new business based on that. The existence of an "unlimited" addressing space for every customer itself will allow to create new services and apps (unfortunately still to come, and that's the main issue), which we will be able to charge for. Also that will generate extra bandwidth demand, which we will also charge for. Of course, at the end is a competition problem. If some carriers/ISPs don't charge for IPv6 service, may be others will need to same if they want to stay in the market. Regards, Jordi
De: Mike Leber <mleber () he net> Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu> Fecha: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Para: Stephen Sprunk <stephen () sprunk org> CC: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog () merit edu> Asunto: Re: IPv6 news On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Stephen Sprunk wrote:It is understandable that you charge extra for a v6-enabled port due to your need to fund upgraded hardware. However, that doesn't explain why you don't deliver v4 and v6 both over the same higher-priced port.We would be happy to do this for anybody that wants to pay for it. The earlier poster implied he didn't want to pay anything extra for IPv6. Mike. +----------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -----------------+ | Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 510 580 4100 | | Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation Fax 510 580 4151 | | mleber () he net http://www.he.net | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
************************************ The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit Information available at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 news, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Oct 14)