nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Mike Leber <mleber () he net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
It is understandable that you charge extra for a v6-enabled port due to your need to fund upgraded hardware. However, that doesn't explain why you don't deliver v4 and v6 both over the same higher-priced port.
We would be happy to do this for anybody that wants to pay for it. The earlier poster implied he didn't want to pay anything extra for IPv6. Mike. +----------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -----------------+ | Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 510 580 4100 | | Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation Fax 510 580 4151 | | mleber () he net http://www.he.net | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Current thread:
- Re: 6to4 gateways, (continued)
- Re: 6to4 gateways Perry Lorier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 13)
- RE: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Oct 14)