nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 vs nanog
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:32:26 +0000
Not directly aimed at William: As others have said before (and I finally listened) PLEASE take this discussion to the shim6 list.
there are some reasons why i'd rather have the discussion here... ) IETF IPR and legal restraints on postings ) shim6 is a protocol design working group, not an operational wg * the IETF has always done operations poorly, it seems worse these days. ) there are enough folks on both that they can "represent" to shim6 list as needed/desired --bill
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Oct 15)
- shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Owen DeLong (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) william(at)elan.net (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) John Payne (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 vs nanog bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 vs nanog John Payne (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Pekka Savola (Oct 16)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Crist Clark (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Meyer (Oct 14)