nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () hotnic net>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:10:36 -0400
Randy Bush wrote:
and don't you just love the suggestions of natting v6?
No, but I would like to see consumer routers support rfc3068 (automatic 6to4 tunneling) by default when there is no native IPv6 access service. If we could convince manufacturers that rfc3068 is "NAT" for ipv6 they'll probably jump right on it :) - Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Joseph S D Yao (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news william(at)elan.net (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Sean Figgins (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Fred Baker (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Oct 14)
- Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Todd Vierling (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Todd Vierling (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Nicholas Suan (Oct 14)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Bernhard Schmidt (Oct 15)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Marshall Eubanks (Oct 15)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border Simon Leinen (Oct 16)
- Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border Todd Vierling (Oct 16)