nanog mailing list archives
Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability)
From: Pete Templin <petelists () templin org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:16:58 -0600
Deepak Jain wrote:
If that model doesn't work for the ISP in question, they should ask Akamai to pull their gear.
And hopefully they'll (someday) send servers in my direction - is their "minimum criteria" creeping upwards at the same rate as overall Internet traffic did in the late 90s?
pt
Current thread:
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability), (continued)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Chris Owen (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Joel Jaeggli (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Deepak Jain (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Chris Owen (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Petri Helenius (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Randy Bush (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Gadi Evron (Nov 29)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Pete Templin (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Simon Lyall (Nov 28)
- Re: trollage (Re: Akamai server reliability) Jon Lewis (Nov 28)