nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:00:02 +0000
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:48:13AM -0500, Sandy Murphy wrote:
Michael Dillon said:The fees are not charged for past services that were received for free, only for future services.So you are saying that legacy space holder who signed a memberhsip agreement would not owe the usual yearly fee associated with their legacy space holdings but only those fees associated with any future address space allocations/assignments? I imagine that would please the legacy space holders. Do you know that this would be the case? I'm not a registry canon law expert myself.
i believe Michael is extrapolating his ideal and not the actual practice at RIRs. --bill
--Sandy
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Sandy Murphy (Nov 25)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Michael . Dillon (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies william(at)elan.net (Nov 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Sandy Murphy (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Michael . Dillon (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Sandy Murphy (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies bmanning (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Michael . Dillon (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Michael . Dillon (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies David Barak (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Joe Abley (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies David Barak (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Joe Abley (Nov 29)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies bmanning (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Michael . Dillon (Nov 28)
- Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies Todd Vierling (Nov 30)