nanog mailing list archives

Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now


From: Erik Haagsman <erik () we-dare net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:40:08 +0100


On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:48 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:46:20 EST, John Payne said:

What am I missing? 

Obviously, the same thing that management at SBC is missing:

<snip>

He argued that because SBC and others have invested to build high-speed
networks, they are due a return.

"There's going to have to be some mechanism for these people ... to pay for the
portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?" He offered
no details how his idea could be accomplished.

For an Internet company to "expect to use these pipes free is nuts!" Whitacre
added for good measure.

</snip>

Sounds like an extremely short-sighted view of the Net and it's
economics. Claiming content providers should be charged for "using"
broadband access-pipes is fine and dandy, but coveniently forgetting
that without content there probably wouldn't be a great deal of
customers wanting broadband in the first place is a bit sloppy, no?

Erik


-- 
Erik Haagsman
Network Architect
We Dare BV
tel: +31.10.7507008
fax: +31.10.7507005

http://www.we-dare.nl


Current thread: